Commercial Appeal filed under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The appellant submitted that the appeal had become infructuous. The High Court of Karnataka held the appeal infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:34358-DB COMAP No. 21 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
I.B.M. INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (SUBSTITUTED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT-1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.12 SUBRAMANYA ARCADE, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560 029 M/S. KYNDRYL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED BLOCK D, 4TH FLOOR EMBASSY GOLF LINKS, INTERMEDIATE RING ROAD DOMLUR, BENGALURU-560 071 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHUJATH AHMED, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:34358-DB COMAP No. 21 of 2024
R/AT. DAGA HOUSE, KOTHI BAZAR BETUR, MADHYA PRADESH-460 001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS)
THIS COMAP / COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS ACT, 2015, PRAYING TO CONSIDER AND PASS THE FOLLOWING ORDERS (a) ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 27.09.2023 IN A.C.No.81/2021 PASSED BY THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:34358-DB COMAP No. 21 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal
has become infructuous.
The said submission is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN)
JUDGE
Sd/(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
RAK,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46
I.B.M. India Private Limited (Substituted) / M/s. Kyndryl Solutions Private Limited
Mr. Shreans Daga
Mr. Niraj Daga
Mr. Kaushik Daga
Mr. Varun Daga
Mrs. Rashi Daga
Anu Sivaraman
G Basavaraja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
