In these contempt proceedings under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the learned Advocates stated that the contemned order dated 22.06.2023 was complied with. Finding that the petition was devoid of substance, the court disposed of the present matter without any further discussion or reasoning.
The present contempt proceedings were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:36415-DB CCC No. 722 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
CCC NO. 722 OF 2024 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
…COMPLAINANT
Digitally signed by PRABHAKAR SWETHA KRISHNAN
Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI DEVARAJ N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI B.S. SHRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT PRAYING TO INITIATE
NC: 2024:KHC:36415-DB CCC No. 722 of 2024
SEVERE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSEDS FOR HAVING DELIBERATELY, INTENTIONALLY AND WILLFULLY DIS-OBEYED TO CARRY OUT THE DIRECTIONS CONTAINED IN THE COURT ORDER DATED 22.06.2023 MADE IN W.P.NO.24514/2021 (S-RES) MARKED AT ANNEXURE – K & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
Learned advocates for the parties stated that the
order under contempt is complied with.
2. In that view, nothing survives in the present
contempt proceedings. Accordingly, they are disposed of.
Sd/(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/(K V ARAVIND) JUDGE
CR / List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to initiate severe contempt proceedings against the accused for disobedience of previous court order.
Whether the present petition requires disposal given compliance of the impugned order.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Kumar
Sri C T Manjunath
N. V. Anjaria
K V Aravind
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
