A civil contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of directions issued in a writ petition was withdrawn by the complainants on the date of hearing; leave was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:6106-DB CCC No. 5 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR P.S.DINESH KUMAR, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2024
BETWEEN :
B RAGHAVENDRA RAO, S/O BHEEMA BHATTA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, CWC EMPLOYEES UNION, No.LF-10, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 091.
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: High Court of Karnataka
…COMPLAINANTS
(BY SMT. SUDHA D. UPPIN, ADVOCATE)
AND :
…ACCUSED
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE, SECURE THE APPEARANCE OF THE RESPONDENTS / ACCUSED AND PUNISH THEM FOR COMMITTING CONTEMPT BY WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE DIRECTIONS OF THIS HON’BLE COURT MADE IN W.P. NO.20002/2023 ON 13.09.2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Smt.Sudha D Uppin, learned advocate for the
complainants has filed a memo dated February 12, 2024
seeking leave to withdraw the petition.
No costs.
Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Central Warehousing Corporation Employees Union (Bengaluru Region) rep. by its General Secretary B Raghavendra Rao
Geetha S J
Kshirodra Kumar Panda
Dr. Sidharth Rath
Smt. Sangeetha Ramrakhyani
Deepu P. Sabu
P.S.Dinesh Kumar
T.G. Shivashankare Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
