The complainant filed a contempt petition alleging non-implementation of previous High Court orders. The complainant's counsel filed a memo seeking dismissal of the complaint as not pressed. The Court, accepting the submission, dismissed the contempt proceedings as not pressed.
Contempt proceedings dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:12359-DB CCC No. 148 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CCC NO. 148 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI C HANUMANTHA RAO S/O LATE CHAVA CHINA VEERABHADRAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS OCC: ADVOCATE R/AT SRI NILAYAM PLOT NO.361, ROAD NO.80 JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD TELANGANA-500033.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. VISHWANATH H M - ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by 1. DR E V RAMANA REDDY SUMATHY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT KANNAN COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT Location: High (INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT) Court of VIKASA SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI Karnataka
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT) VIKASA SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001.
NC: 2024:KHC:12359-DB CCC No. 148 of 2022
…ACCUSED
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT PRYAING TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONTEMPT AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.6635/2014 C/W W.P.NO. 25236/2019 AND W.P.NO.33737/2013 (LA-KIADB) DATED 09.07.2021 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND DIRECT THE ACCUSED TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER DATED 03.12.20212 PASSED BY THE ACCUSED NO.4 UNDER SECTION 28(3) OF THE KIADB ACT, AS IT IS AN ORDER OF THE GOVERNMENT AS THE GOVERNMENT HAD DELEGATED THE POWERS OF THE GOVERNMENT TO THE SLAO FOR DELETION OF COMPLAINANT’S LAND TO AN ETENT OF 4-00 ACRES IN SY.NO.176/12, 176/35 AND 176/121 (EARLIER SURVEY NO.176) SITUATED AT BENGALURU VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA.
THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, K. SOMASHEKAR .J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel Shri Vishwanath H.M. for the
complainant is present before Court physically.
09.07.2021 vide Annexure-“E”.
counsel for the complainant and in view of the memo filed
NC: 2024:KHC:12359-DB CCC No. 148 of 2022
by the learned counsel for the complainant, this contempt
proceeding is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings initiated by the complainant against the accused for non-implementation of court orders should be dismissed as not pressed?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
K. Somashekar
Rajesh Rai K
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
