Official Liquidator of v. Mr S S Dahiya
Case brief
What is this about?
2024:KHC:11798 CA No. 35 of 2024 In CA…
2024:KHC:11798 CA No. 35 of 2024 In CA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:11798 CA No. 35 of 2024 In CA No.238 of 2011 In COP No.175 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2024 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 238 OF 2011 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 175 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S COMPUDYNE WINFOSYSTEMS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CORPORATE BHAVAN, NOS 26-27, 12TH FLOOR, RAJEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560001
…APPLICANT
(BY SRI. SHRISHAIL NAVALGUND., ADVOCATE FOR OL)
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
PROPOSED RESPONDENT
SMT SUMITHRA DAHIYA W/O S S DAHIYA, 452, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD CROSS, 15TH MAIN, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560010
…PROPOSED RESPONDENT
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 6 AND9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959 R/W ORDER I RULE 10 OF THE CPC, 1908 PRAYING TO PETMIT THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR TO IMPLEAD THE PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.1 IN COMPANY APPLICATION IN LIEU OF LATE S.S. DAHIYA AND ETC.
NC: 2024:KHC:11798 CA No. 35 of 2024 In CA No.238 of 2011 In COP No.175 of 2004
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
NC: 2024:KHC:11798 CA No. 35 of 2024 In CA No.238 of 2011 In COP No.175 of 2004
Sd/JUDGE
SR List No.: Sl No.:
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S COMPUDYNE WINFOSYSTEMS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
MR S S DAHIYA
MR JABBAR AFAAQ
MR MARC KOLBA
MR K G PRAKASH
SMT SUMITRA DAHIYA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court