Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 to quash a notice was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner filing a memo seeking permission to dismiss the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 9811 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9811 OF 2017 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
MUNNEKOLALA, MARATHAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 037. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M.KEERTHY
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANIAN K B S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by POORNIMA SHIVANNA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. DR R RAMACHANDRAN FOR R1 & 2.,ADVOCATE)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
WP No. 9811 of 2017
NOTICE AT ANNEX-A DTD.15.2.2017 ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED NOTICE AT ANNEX-A DTD.15.2.2017 ISSUED BY THE R-2.
THIS WP, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
GJM
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Happi Organic Owned by Kanakadhara Nutrition P Ltd
The Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike
The Health Officer CV Raman Nagar Ward
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
