M/S Sufi Enterprises v. Shri S Ravishankar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226/226 of Constitution of India seeking refund of security deposit from a private landlord respondent. Court held that as the dispute is purely private, writ is not maintainable.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to avail of other remedies.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:38388 WP No. 8475 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 8475 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S SUFI ENTERPRISES NO.376, TRINITY SQUARE, GROUND FLOOR, RIGHT WING, 14-B CROSS, 6TH SECTOR, H S R LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560102 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR SYED IMTIAZ AHMED.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJENDRA M A.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable against a private landlord for refund of security deposit allegedly withheld.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S SUFI ENTERPRISES NO.376 REPR BY MR SYED IMTIAZ AHMED
- respondent
PADMAVATHI SHRI S. RAVISHANKAR B K
Coram
M. NagappRASANNA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/8475/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court