Petitioners, retired tourism officials, challenged a Lokayukta recommendation questioning disciplinary enquiry competence. Absent counsel sought adjournment; court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:24608-DB WP No. 8454/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2023 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT PETITION NO.8454/2023 (GM-KLA)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka
GADAG – 582 101 … PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:24608-DB WP No. 8454/2023
BENGALURU - 560001 REPTD. BY ITS REGISTRAR … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.GOPAL KRISHNA SOODI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI.ASHWIN S HALADI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE RECOMMENDATION BEING MADE BY THE HON’BLE UPA-LOKAYUKTA VIDE ANNEXURE-C VIDE ORDER NO.UPLOK-2/DE/173/2018/ARE-9 DATED 30-12-2022 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, K.S.MUDAGAL J. , MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
No representation for the petitioners.
on the ground that there is no merit in the case. The records show that, there was no representation for the petitioners on the previous hearing dates also.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
PKN
T.V.L.N.Raju S/O Venkataramaiah
Vittal R Gowdar S/O Ramana Gowda
The Additional Chief Secretary Department of Tourism Vikasa Soudha Bengaluru
The Office of the Lokayuktha M S Building Dr Ambedkar Veedhi Bengaluru
K.S. Mudagal
Ramachandra D. Huddar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
