Writ petitions filed by hawkers praying for permission to carry on business or create hawking zones were dismissed as withdrawn by the Karnataka High Court upon counsel undertaking to file a withdrawal memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO. 77751 TO 77756 OF 2013 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
ROHAN HADIMANI T Digitally signed by ROHAN HADIMANI T
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI V.M. SHEELVANT & SRI VINAY S. KOUJALAGI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR R1-R3 SRI ANANDKUMAR A. MAGADUM & SMT. ARCHANA A. MAGADUM, ADV. FOR R4
& SRI C.V. ANGADI, ADV. FOR R4)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PERMIT THEM TO CARRY ON THEIR HAWKING BUSINESS UNLESS THEY ARE REHABILITATED OR UNTIL HAWKING ZONES ARE CREATED AND HAWKING IS REGULATED.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the
writ petitions shall be dismissed as withdrawn. He also undertakes to file a memo in this regard.
Submission is placed on record.
Writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
RH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mastanamma W/o. Sekanna
Padma W/o. Gadilingappa
Laxmi W/o. Shivashankarappa
Radha W/o. Hulagappa
Gangamma W/o. Shanmukappa
Chanamma W/o. H.M. Ramadas
M.I.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
