Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 to quash a notification. The court disposed of the petition as having been withdrawn with the short office objections overruled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 7733 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 7733 OF 2020 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
RAVISH S, S/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO 16 VEDERAHALLI VILLAGE, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE – 560 020.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. THIMMARAYAPPA D C.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.N SRIDHAR HEGDE, AGA FOR R1; SMT.PUSHPAKANTHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DATED 30.10.2018 WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
WP No. 7733 of 2020
ORDER
This Petition is disposed off as having been
withdrawn in terms of the Memo dated 19.01.2023, the short Office Objections having been overruled because of
their insignificance.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
Ravish S
The State of Karnataka
The Bangalore Development Authority
Krishna S Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
