Govinda Raju v. the Deputy Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of an impugned order under the SARFAESI Act and a direction for settlement was disposed of as infructuous because the bank had received the full amount and executed a discharge deed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was disposed of; the order dated 18.09.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner was quashed, and the petitioner was entitled to consequential benefits.