The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. However, the petitioner did not appear or present any representation, and the case was called twice without success. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution without adjudicating any substantive issue or construing any law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 684 OF 2017 (GM-SLUM)
BETWEEN:
SMT. R. NAGARANI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, D/O LATE M. RADHAKRISHNA, W/O T. PADMANABHAN R/AT NO.1, APPANNA GARDEN, DODDAKUNTE, COX TOWN, P.S.K. NAIDU ROAD, BANGALORE-560005.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:33584 WP No. 684 of 2017
RESPONDENTS 4(a) TO 4(f) AND 5 ARE R/AT NO.1, APPANNA GARDEN, DODDAGUNTA, BEHIND KARIAMMA TEMPLE, P.S.K. NAIDU ROAD, COX TOWN, BANGALORE-560005.
NC: 2023:KHC:33584 WP No. 684 of 2017
RESPONDENT NOS.6 TO 48 ARE R/AT APPANNA GARDEN, DODDAKUNTE, COX TOWN, BANGALORE-560005.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CLIFTON D'ROZARIO, ADVOCATE FOR CAVEATOR /RESPONDENT NO.6, AND RESPONDENT NO.24;
SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2;
SRI. R. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3;
NC: 2023:KHC:33584 WP No. 684 of 2017
SRI. R. ABDUL RAYAZ KHAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.4(a) TO 4(f);
NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NOS.5, 7, 8, 8(a), 9, 11, 13 TO 20, 22, 23, 25 TO 44, 46, 48 AND 49;
VIDE ORDER DATED 07.09.2023, RESPONDENT NOS.10, 12, 21, 45 AND 47 ARE DELETED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 14.11.2016 REFERENCE NO. VE 158 KME 2016 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner though the case is called twice in the day.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SMA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
Smt. R. Nagarani
The Principal Secretary Housing Department
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
