Mr Y B Shamanna v. the Authorized Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:45458 WP No. 6125 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO.6125 OF 2023 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: High Court of Karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI KARAN BORAIAH D.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:45458 WP No. 6125 of 2023
…RESPONDENTS
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.03.2023 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (DRT-2) IN S.A.NO.114/2023 IN SO FAR AS REFUSAL TO CONSIDER THE I.A. NO.1/2023 AND I.A. NO.2/2023 FILED BY THE APPELLANTS HERERIN AND DIRECT THE HON'BLE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL TO CONSIDER THE I.A. NO.1/2023 AND I.A. NO.2/2023 FOR STAY FILED BY THE APPELLANTS HEREIN IN S.A.NO.114/2023 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo dated 14.12.2023 seeking to withdraw the petition as the same having become infructuous.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
RU
Mr. Y.B. Shannamma
Mr. Raghunath S.
The Authorized Officer, UCO Bank Ltd.
Mr. Mohammed Sulthan Serief
M.G.S. Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court