High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petition No. 6093 of 2010 as withdrawn upon petitioner's filing of a memo seeking withdrawal and not pressing the matter.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:20028 WP No. 6093 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 6093 OF 2010 (SC-ST)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYAN N Location: High Court of Karnataka
ALL ARE RESIDING AT THIMMEGOWDANA HOSAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. N. R. NAIK & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE; SRI. P. M. NARAYANASWAMY & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATE FOR P1 & P2 (N.O.C))
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:20028 WP No. 6093 of 2010
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VENKATASATHYANARAYAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. LOMESH KIRAN N., ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 READ WITH UNDER ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOQUASH AND SET ASIDE THE OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM ISSUED DTD 08.10.07 BY THE R2, PRODUCED AT ANNEX-E. DECLARE THAT THE R5 HAS NO MANNER OF RIGHT, TITLE OF THE LAND IN QUESTION IN PURSUANCE OF AGREEMENT OF SALE DTD 12.01.07 & SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE CREATED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE GOVERNMENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 12.06.2023, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition as not pressed.
NC: 2023:KHC:20028 WP No. 6093 of 2010
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
hdk List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Naraynamma and Others
State of Karnataka
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
