Smt Prameela v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an auction notice. The court dismissed the petition because the petitioner failed to comply with the condition imposed in an earlier interim order of this court, which stipulated that non-payment would lead to dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Quashing of the sale auction notice and sale notice was dismissed.