Disposed

Sri Charan Kumar Ur v. the Managing Director

Karnataka HC1 Aug 2023WP/57796/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a preliminary hearing, the Karnataka High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by Charan Kumar Ur. The court directed the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation to consider the petitioner's representations within six weeks and disposed of the writ petition on that direction.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent Corporation to consider the petitioner's representations within six weeks of receipt of the certified copy of the order.

Sri Charan Kumar Ur Vs the Managing Director — Service and Employment | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:26821 WP No. 57796 of 2018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO.57796 OF 2018 (S-KSRTC)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI CHARAN KUMAR UR, S/O UK RAME GOWDA, AGED 37 YEARS, R/AT MANITH NILAYA, 2^ND MAIN, 5^TH CROSS, HEMAVATI NAGAR, HASSAN - 573 201.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI.A.J.SRINIVASAN., ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, K H ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027.

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE DIRECTOR (P & E), KSRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, K H ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027.

¶14

THE GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL), KSRTC CENTRAL OFFICE, K H ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI.HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2023:KHC:26821 WP No. 57796 of 2018

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Sri.Hareesh Bhandary.T., learned counsel for respondents has appeared in person.

¶23

The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking the Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Corporation to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner at Annexures-F, G

¶24

& H.

¶25

Counsel Sri.Hareesh Bhandary.T., submits that direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner and the Corporation will consider the representations within six weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

¶26

The oral submission made by learned counsel for respondents is placed on record.

¶27

The Writ of Mandamus is ordered. A direction is issued to the respondent Corporation to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner vide Annexures-F, G & H within six

¶28

NC: 2023:KHC:26821 WP No. 57796 of 2018

¶29

¶30

weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

¶31

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of .

¶32

Sd/JUDGE

¶33

TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 122

Sri Charan Kumar Ur v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Charan Kumar Ur v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramappa Vs the Secretary

Sri Venkatappa Vs Smt Sonnamma

B N Umesh Vs the Mysore Paper Mills Ltd.

M/S. Eastern Silk Industries Ltd. Vs Shri Shafiulla

Naveen. L Vs the Managing Director and the Chairmen

Sri S C Shivakumar Vs the Chief Traffic Manager