Seetha Udayashankar Bhat v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution by a petitioner, the President of an SDMC, which sought to quash a notice issued by the Head Master. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn by mutual agreement following a satisfaction from the petitioner's counsel regarding the withdrawal of the impugned notice.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
- 1 -
WP No. 564 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 564 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SEETHA UDAYASHANKAR BHAT W/O UDAYASHANAKR BHAT AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS PRESIDENT (SDMC) PANAJE RESIDING AT CHAMBARAKATTA HOUSE PANAJE POST AND VILLAGE ARLAPADAVU, PUTTUR TALUKU D.K.DISTRICT – 574 259.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LETHIF B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Seetha Udayashankar Bhat
- respondent
The State of Karnataka
- respondent
Block Education Officer Puttur
- respondent
The Head Master Dakshina Kannada Zilla Panchayat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/564/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court