Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed to quash a notification constituting an enquiry committee. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to challenge the enquiry report.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the enquiry report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
WRIT PETITION NO.5604 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
PROF. H. RAJASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. HOLEBASAPPA, DEAN, DEPT OF COMMERCE AND VICE CHANCELLOR (IN-CHARGE) UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE, MYSURU, R/O. NO.28, C BLOCK, ANANDNAGAR, MYSORE – 570022. ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI N. KHETTY FOR SMT. AKKAMAHADEVI HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 6TH FLOOR, GATE NO.2, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU–560001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
BENGALURU–560001.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B. RAVINDRANATH AGA FOR R-1 & R-3; SRI T.P. RAJENDRA KUMAR SANGAY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE NOTIFICATION DATED 17.12.2022 IN No ED 104 UKV 2022 (ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY THE R-1 CONSTITUTING THE ENQUIRY COMMITTEE.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition challenging the enquiry report.
Accepting the said memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the enquiry report.
RK CT: RM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66
Sd/JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
nullReferred
null
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Prof. H. Rajashekar
State of Karnataka
The Registrar, University of Mysore
The Enquiry Committee
N S Sanjay Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
