Sri Syed Farooq v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an acquisition notification via writ petition. Court directed parties to agree to a suggestion waiving challenge against broader acquisition but acknowledging petitioner's entitlement to compensation share as a buyer despite lack of mutation name. Court ordered release of compensation and disposed of the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to waive challenge to full acquisition extent. Appropriate authority directed to release petitioner's share of compensation within two months upon indemnity; writ petition disposed