Petitioner challenged failure to regularize service and grant pensionary benefits. Petitioner contended relief became infructuous as authorities considered grievance. Court dismissed petition as infructuous.
Relief sought was to regularize service and disburse pensionary benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:18962 WP NO.5382 OF 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.5382 OF 2022 (S-REG)
BETWEEN:
MANJULA RAJAKUMAR W/O RAJAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.1, GAYATRI NILAYA, 5TH STAGE, BEHIND RMP QUARTERS, AADHICHUNCHANAGIRI ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGAR, MYSURU – 570 024.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHARATH S. GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:18962 WP NO.5382 OF 2022
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.S. NAGARAJRA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 & R5; SMT. GEETHA DEVI M.P., ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT-AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER AS REGULARIZED FROM THE DATE ON WHICH SHE COMPLETES 10 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS SERVICE FROM THE INITIAL DATE OF HER APPOINTMENT BY MODIFYING THE ORDER DATED 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2020 AND NOTIFICATION DATED 22ND OCTOBER, 2020 PASSED BY RESPONDENTS 1 AND 4 VIDE ANNEXURES ‘G’ AND ‘H’ RESPECTIVELY; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT-AUTHORITIES TO DISBURSE PENSIONARY AND OTHER RETIRAL BENEFITS ON THE BASIS THAT THE SERVICE OF PETITIONER IS REGULARIZED ON COMPLETION OF TEN YEARS OF SERVICE FROM THE DATE OF HER INITIAL APPOINTMENT/ENGAGEMENT; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:18962 WP NO.5382 OF 2022
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition has become infructuous as the respondent No.4-Corporation has considered the grievance of the petitioner. Submission is placed on record.
Accepting the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
ARK
Manjula Rajakumar W/O Rajakumar
The State of Karnataka Rep. by its Chief Secretary
The State of Karnataka Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development
Directorate of Municipal Administration Rep. by its Secretary
Mysuru City Corporation
The Deputy Commissioner Mysuru
E.S. Indires
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
