Classes (Reservation of Appointment, etc) Act of 1990 and Rules, 1992 (henceforth referred to as Act of 1990 and Rules, 1992 for short) and contends that there is no provision to review. Therefore, the impugned order passed by the respondent No.1 is without authority of law. He further relied upon the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of V.S.Bali Vs. State Bank of Hyderabad in Writ Appeal No.604/2007 dated 26.11.2012 , where a Division Bench of this Court after considering a similar case, held that "neither the Act nor Rules made thereunder bestow any power of review on the committee. The committee becomes functus officio, the moment it ordered on 08.06.1988, that the appellant belongs to 'gonda' community and issued Validity Certificate. Thereafter the committee did not have any authority in law, whatsoever to pass the impugned order after five years. Even otherwise, the subsequent proceedings based on the 2nd complaint are not only without authority of law, but are without holding enquiry." The Division Bench held that the learned Single Judge though was justified in setting aside the impugned order, but was not justified in remanding the matter to the committee and also held that the learned Single Judge could not have remitted the
