Smt Chayadevi(Geetha) v. Sri R Shivanna
Case brief
What is this about?
No. 43727 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
No. 43727 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 43727 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 43727 OF 2019 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHAYADEVI (GEETHA) WIFE OF SHIVANNA D/O RAJANNA V AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.418 5TH MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS ROAD, NEAR SATHISH CIRCLE RAJAGOPALANAGAR BENGALURU-560058.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NINGARAJU M. N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI. R SHIVANNA SON OF LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.428 5TH MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS ROAD, NEAR SATHISH CIRCLE RAJAGOPAL NAGAR BENGALURU-560058. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VENKATESH C R., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.08.2019 ON IA NOS.9 AND 10 IN M.C.NO.5544/2016 VIDE ANNX-A PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE VI ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU AND ETC.
WP No. 43727 of 2019
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.02.2020 seeking withdrawal of this petition, as the matter before the trial Court has culminated into a judgment and decree on 08.01.2020 and hence the present petition would not survive for consideration.
Placing the memo on record, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
DL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Chayadevi (Geetha)
Sri. R Shivanna
Praadeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court