A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as it had become infructuous upon the acceptance of the petitioner's counsel's submission.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP NO.43718 OF 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO.43718 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. H.S. SAVITHRI W/O LATE H.S. SOMANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT HEBBALE VILLAGE & POST, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI, SOMWARPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT – 571 236.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. L.S. CHIKKANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
WP NO.43718 OF 2016
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28TH FEBRUARY, 2015 PASSED ON IA NO.2 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.39 OF 2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMWARPET, ITINERATE COURT AT KUSHALNAGAR VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared through video conferencing submits that the petition has become infructuous. Submission is placed on record.
Accepting the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
ARK
SMT. H.S. SAVITHRI W/O LATE H.S. SOMANNA
SMT. DEVAMMA W/O LATE SIDDALINGAPPA
M.R. JAGADISH S/O RAMEGOWDA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
