Disposed

Mrs. P.Radhamma v. Mr Jayasheel G

Karnataka HC25 Jul 2023WP/40237/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed writ seeking to quash order by Additional Commissioner directing transfer of khata. Petitioner and first respondent submitted compromise in civil court requiring transfer of khata to petitioner. Court noted decree pending in civil court and directed transfer of khata based on compromise.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to note decree in O.S. No. 4317/2015 and transfer khata from first respondent to petitioner.

Mrs. P.Radhamma Vs Mr Jayasheel G — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:25844 WP No. 40237 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF JULY, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 40237 OF 2017 (LB-BMP)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MRS. P.RADHAMMA W/O MR K GOPALA REDDY R/A NO.5, 1^ST CROSS VENKATARAMAIAH LAYOUT R M NAGAR MAIN ROAD DODDABANASWADI BANGALORE-560043

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. K V SHYAMA PRASADA., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

MR JAYASHEEL G

¶13

S/O MR K GOPAL REDDY Digitally signed by JUANITA R/A NO.340 THEJESWINI 2^ND B CROSS, 4^TH MAIN Location: HIGH COURT OF OMBR LAYOUT, BANASWADI KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560043

¶14

ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER MARUTHISEVANAGAR SUB DIVISION BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BANGALORE-560001

¶15

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER(EAST) BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE

¶16

¶17

NC: 2023:KHC:25844 WP No. 40237 of 2017

¶18

MAYOHALL BANGALORE-560001

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. B RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. OMKAR KAMBI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF ORDER PASSED BY THE R-3 DTD. 30.05.2017 VIDE ANNX-G. AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-3 DTD. 30.05.2017 VIDE ANNX-G.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

¶25

Learned Counsels for the petitioner and respondent No.1 jointly submit that in O.S.No.4317/2015 filed by the petitioner herein against respondent No.1, the parties have filed a compromise petition. It is stated in the compromise petition that the petitioner and her husband Sri K.Gopala Reddy shall continue to enjoy the properties

¶26

in question during their lifetime. Thereafter, the property will revert to the first respondent herein.

¶27

NC: 2023:KHC:25844 WP No. 40237 of 2017

¶28

¶29

This writ petition is pertaining to the khata in

¶30

respect of the two items of property. In view of the compromise petition filed by the parties before the Civil Court, the second respondent-Assistant Revenue Officer shall accordingly take note of the decree that would be passed by the Civil Court in O.S.No.4317/2015 and transfer the khata from the name of the first respondent to the name of the petitioner. All further action shall be taken in accordance with law.

¶31

Ordered accordingly.

¶32

Sd/JUDGE

¶33

JT/-

Mrs. P.Radhamma v. Mr Jayasheel G

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. P.Radhamma v. Mr Jayasheel G

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Vibha v Kamath Vs State of Karnataka

Sri.H.Ramaiah Vs the Commissioner

The Archbishop of Bangalore, Vs Mr Harishchandra Shetty

Sri C M Lingaraju Vs the State of Karnataka

The Karnataka Government Class-D Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Jayalakshmi Vs Shivamogga-Bhadravathi