High Court judge dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn following a memo from petitioners' counsel stating the petitioners were already acquitted of the offences by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 3739 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NITIN A.M., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:42949 WP No. 3739 of 2020
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-01.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY RESPONDENT POLICE IN C.C.NO.2208/2019 IN THE COURT OF THE IIND JMFC AT MANGALORE IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS IS CONCERNED ANNEXURE-C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating that the petitioners are already acquitted of the offences alleged against them before the Trial Court and therefore, this petition does not survive for consideration.
NC: 2023:KHC:42949 WP No. 3739 of 2020
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Mr. Gunapala
Mr. Narayana
The State of Karnataka
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
