Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution dismissed as infructuous after counsel for petitioners submitted the petition had lost its object during preliminary hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:32537 WP No. 3469 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3469 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
S/O GANDLAPALLI MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ROOPESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by A K CHANDRIKA Location: High Court of Karnataka
MUNEMMA W/O NARAYANAPPA K., AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O BEERAKAYALAKOTE VILLAGE, LAKSHMIPURA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NELAVANKI HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK-563135.
…RESPONDENT
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.01.2019 PASSED IN M.A.NO.25/2018 ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
NC: 2023:KHC:32537 WP No. 3469 of 2020
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri. Roopesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners appears through video conference and submits that the petition be dismissed as it has become infructuous.
petitioners is placed on record.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
SMJ
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
Jayamma W/o Venkateshappa and others
Munemma W/o Narayanappa K.
S.G. Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
