Sri.Prakash Ramachandra Sapkal v. the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, (Kptcl)
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought compensation for high tension power line acquisition via Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The court dismissed the petition upon withdrawal by the petitioner with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's prayer for compensation is dismissed as the petition has been withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.