A writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as having become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 32456 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.32456 OF 2016 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
M/S LAVA KUSHA TRANSPORT REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, K R SRINIVASA REDDY S/O K R RAJAKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS O/AT HOSUR ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY POST BENGALURU - 560 100
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by GAYATHRI N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
WP No. 32456 of 2016
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SIDDAPPA V.B, ADVOCATE FOR R6;
SRI. K.V.BATHEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 & R7 - ABSENT; SRI. G.R.VENKATESH MURTHY, ADVCOATE FOR R4ABSENT;
R1-SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN Kaa.Paa.A/Bho.Vi/P.R.01/2016-17 DATED 30.05.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-J; b) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS AS DEEM FIT BY THIS HON'BLE COURT ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
WP No. 32456 of 2016
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by
efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
The aforesaid submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having
been infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S LAVA KUSHA TRANSPORT REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, K R SRINIVASA REDDY
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
