Petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition challenging a civil court order. The court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, noting the underlying suit had been disposed of by compromise.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 31964 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
W/O MUNIYAPPA,
Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: High Court of Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
PETITIONERS No.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT BEERANDAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKA ANKANDAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK-563114
PETITIONERS No.1,2 AND 4 ARE REP. BY THEIR GPA HOLDER PETITIONER NO.3
SRI MUNISWAMY, S/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT BEERANDAHALLI VILLAGE,
WP No. 31964 of 2019
CHIKKA ANKANDAHALLIPOST, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK-563114
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. AMRUTHA S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAGHAVENDRA RAO K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHIRAMAPPA S/O NADEVE MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT BEERANDAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKA ANKANDAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK-563114
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S.Y. KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON THE UNREGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 21.04.1987 BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANGARPET IN O.S.NO.87/2007 DATED 10.07.2019 FOUND AT ANNX-C, ALLOW THIS W.P. WITH COSTS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioners filed a memo seeking
permission to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that the suit in O.S.No.87/2007 is disposed of vide judgment and decree dated 09.02.2023, in terms of the
WP No. 31964 of 2019
compromise entered into by the parties. In view of the
same, the petitioners do not want to proceed with the case.
withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the withdrawal of the writ petition due to disposal of the underlying suit by compromise should be allowed.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Venkateshappa
Pillappa
Muniswamy
Akkamma
Shirappa
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
