This writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution sought to quash an impugned e-procurement tender notification. The High Court, on preliminary hearing, found the petition had become infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION No.2680 OF 2017 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
2
3
AND:
(BY SRI K.N.PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED E-PROCUREMENT TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.A.AA (PA)/PR/59/16-17 DATED 18.11.2016 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-F.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.G.S.Naveen Kumar., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.Mukkannappa.S.B., for petitioners has appeared in person.
4
Counsel submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
The oral submission made on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner is placed on record.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking to quash the tender notification is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Venkatesh T.
Sri K.Mohan
Sri D.Manju
Sri Narasimhaiah
Sri Kondaya
Sri Chinnaiah
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
