D Basavalingappa v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for set aside of Administrative Tribunal order and grant of benefits. Petitioner absent at three hearings. Court dismissed petition for non-prosecution.
Writ petition filed for set aside of Administrative Tribunal order and grant of benefits. Petitioner absent at three hearings. Court dismissed petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 23127 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH WRIT PETITION NO. 23127 OF 2019 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
D.BASAVALINGAPPA S/O GURUGAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS LECTURER GOVERNMENT P.U. COLLEGE MEGARAHALLI THIRTHAHALLI TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 201.
REPRESENTED BY SRI. S.NARAYANA NAGESH KUMAR G.M. ADVOCATES NO.974, 66TH CROSS 5TH BLOCK , RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE – 560 010.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARAYANA S., ADVOCATE) ABSENT
AND:
WP No. 23127 of 2019
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE – 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHOWRI H.R., AGA FOR R1-4 SRI. RAMESH B.R., ADVOCATE FOR R-5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER MADE BY KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ON 20.6.2018 IN APPLICATION NO.2770/2006 DISMISSING THE SAID APPLICATION (ANNX-A) AND ALLOW THE RELIEF SOUGHT IN THE SAID APPLICATION WITH DIRECTION TO RESPONDENTS TO GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, G. NARENDAR J. , MADE THE FOLLOWING:
WP No. 23127 of 2019
ORDER
Case called out. There is no representation.
Neither the petitioner’s counsel nor the petitioner is present.
The matter was called on 19.08.2021, even on that date, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. We find that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
UN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.BASAVALINGAPPA
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
THE DIRECTOR PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH
G. NARENDAR
S RACHAIAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court