Petitioners filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a notice and direct consideration of a representation. The petition was withdrawn by the petitioners during hearing and disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 2239 OF 2020 (GM-KSFC)
BETWEEN:
MALUR TALUK AND KOLAR DISTRICT
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS (BY SMT. NEERAJA KARANTH, ADVOCATE)
NC: 2023:KHC:39872 WP No. 2239 of 2020
AND:
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
REP. BY ITS ASST. GENERAL MANAGER
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.BIPIN HEGDE, ADV.)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER/NOTICE DATED 24.12.2019 FILED AS ANNX-A TO THE W.P.; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.09.2019 AT ANNX-B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a
memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
KG
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44
1 provisions across 1 enactments
H. Ramesh
Rajappa
Pushpa
Sujatha
Karnataka State Financial Corporation
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
