This writ petition under Article 226 was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners on the preliminary hearing date, with liberty to file necessary applications in other pending writs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 22031 OF 2023 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
RESIDING AT NO. 46, KAIKARA STREET, ARCAT, RANIPET, TAMIL NADU-632 503.
Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: High Court of Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O K PONMUDI, RESIDING AT NO.07, 11TH MAIN, MARUTI LAYOUT, HONGASANDRA BENGLURU 560 068.
(BY SRI. KARTIK B., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SIJI MALAYIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRINCE ISAC, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR SUCH ORDER TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25/09/2023 MADE BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENTS AFFIXED AT ANNEXUREA. B) DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE HALL TICKETS AND PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO TAKE UP THEIR SECOND SEMESTER EXAMINATIONS FOR 5 YEARS B.B.A LL.B COURSE WHICH IS GOING TO BE COMMENCED FROM 04/09/2023 AND ANNOUNCE THEIR RESULTS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file necessary applications in W.P.No.7831/2023 and W.P.No. 8444/2023.
withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.
SD/JUDGE
RD
Nethravathi V
Kannan C
P Dinesh
Mondi Venkata Dilip Kumar
Pradeep V K
Vishnu E
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
