Dismissed

Sri M S Shadakashari v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Feb 2023WP/2134/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking directions to respondents to act on an endorsement dated 27.10.2022 regarding disability pension. The Court rejected the petition, holding that no interference is necessary as there is already a reference to the Hon’ble Lokayukta for enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Court rejected the petition and directed the petitioners to approach the Lokayukta reference.

Sri M S Shadakashari Vs State of Karnataka — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 2134 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2134 OF 2023 (S-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI M S SHADAKASHARI S/O LATE M S SOMASHEKHARAIAH AGED 50 YEARS R/AT T MAYAGOWDANAHALLI HALLI MYSORE HOBLI AND POST HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN - 573 121

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. AKKI MANJUNATH GOWDA K., ADVOCATE)

¶11

Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

AND:

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY BANGALORE - 560001

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION K R CIRCLE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001

¶15

¶16

WP No. 2134 of 2023

¶17

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATIVE) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

¶18

HASSAN - 573 201

¶19

BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION HOLENARASIPURA, HASSAN - 573 211

¶20

THE DIRECTOR

¶21

DEPT. FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF DIFFERENTLY ABLED AND SENIOR CITIZENS PODIUM BLOCK, VISHVESWARAIAH TOWER DR AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001

¶22

SRI M GANESH S/O MADAPPA MAJOR IN AGE TEACHER GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOL T MAYAGOWDANAHALLI HALLI MYSORE HOBLI AND POST HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN - 573 211

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI. T.P.SRINIVASA, PRL. GOVT. ADVOCATE)

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 TO 5 TO ACT ON THE ENDORSEMENT DT 27.10.2022 AND ALSO TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 15.10.2022 AND 16.01.23 OF THE PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-A TO D.

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶27

¶28

WP No. 2134 of 2023

¶29

ORDER

¶30

The petitioner has filed this petition for directions to the second to the fifth respondents to act on the Endorsement dated 27.10.2022

¶31

(Annexure-B), which reads as under:

¶32

“�ೕಲ�ಂಡ�ಷಯ�ೆ� ಸಂಬಂ��ದಂ�ೆ ��ೕಗ�ೇಶಎಂ . ಸಹ ��ಕರು , ಸ�ಾ� ! ಯ "ಾ�ಥ$ಕ %ಾ&ೆ , ಮುಕ�ನಹ)* , +ೊ-ೆನರ�ೕಪ/ರ�ಾಲೂ0ಕುಇವರುನಕ3ಅಂಗ�ಕಲಪ�5ಾಣಪತ� 8ೕ9 :ೇಮ�ಾ; +ೊಂ<ರುವ/ದ ಂದ ಸದ ��ಕರ �ರುದ= �ಸು> ಕ�ಮ �ೈ@ೊಳBವಂ�ೆ 8ಮC ಉ&ೆ0ೕEತ ಪತ�ದ30 �ೋ ರುವ/ದು ಸ ಯFೆG . ಆದIೆ ಈ@ಾಗ&ೇ ಅಂಗ�ಕಲ �ೋKಾದ9 :ೇಮ�ಾ; +ೊಂ<ರುವ ��ಕರನುL M&ಾ0 NೈದO!ೕಯ wæ ಸದಸO ಸ$;ಯವ ಂದಮರು NೈದO!ೕಯತ"ಾಸ�ೆಯನುL ನPೆಸ&ಾQದುR ಅಂಗ�ಕಲ ಪ�5ಾಣ %ೇ _40%_ !�ಂತಕ9�ಇರುವ��ಕರ�ರುದ= �ಸು> ಕ�ಮ�ೈ@ೊಳಲು �SಾರಸುT 5ಾಡ&ಾQರುತ>Uೆ . ಮರು NೈದO!ೕಯ ಪ ೕVೆಯ30 ��ೕ ಗ�ೇಶ . ಎಂ . ಸ� , ಸ!"ಾ�%ಾ&ೆ , ಮುಕ�ನಹ)* , ಇವರಅಂಗ�ಕಲ�ೆ ' ಪ�5ಾಣವ/ %ೇ 40 !�ಂತಕ9� ಇರುವ/ದ ಂದ ಸದ ��ಕರ �ರುದ= �ಸು> ಕ�ಮ�ೆ� �SಾರಸುT 5ಾಡ&ಾQರುತ>Uೆ . +ಾಗೂ ಸ�ಾ�ರದ ಆUೇಶ ಸಂ ಇ9 210 WXಎY 2019 Zೆಂಗಳ[ರು <:ಾಂಕ _30-10-2021_ ರ ಆUೇಶದಲ0 ಸದ ��ಕರ �ರುದ= �\ಾರ�ೆ ನPೆಸಲು 5ಾನO ಉಪ &ೋ�ಾಯುಕ>ರು , Zೆಂಗಳ[ರು ಇವ @ೆ ವ]� ಆUೇ�ಸ&ಾQರುತ>Uೆ ಎಂಬ�ಷಯವನುL ಈಮೂಲಕ 8ಮC ಗಮನ�ೆ� ತರ&ಾQUೆ .”

¶33

¶34

WP No. 2134 of 2023

¶35

If there is already a reference to the Hon’ble Lokayukta for enquiry, at this stage, there is no need for this Court’s interference and as such, the petition stands rejected.

¶36

SD/JUDGE

¶37

Sri M S Shadakashari v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri M S Shadakashari v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Miss D Manjula Vs the State of Karnataka

Sujatha. S Vs Raytharashakari Sanga Ltd.

Shwetha Mahabaleshwar Naik Vs Director

Sri. Raghavendra N. a. Vs State of Karnataka

Rathnsingh Naik Vs the Director (a and H R)

The Hassan District Central Co. Operative Bank Vs the State of Karnataka