Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking restraint on BSNL from considering specific tenders. The court disposed of the matter as having become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 18445 OF 2017 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. KESHAVA BHAT A., ADVOCATE)
…PETITIONERS
AND:
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO NOTICE INVITING TENDER DATED 20.12.2016 AND ON PERUSAL OF THE SAME; RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES FROM CONSIDERING THE BIDS OF R-6 TO 11 SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THE TENDER NOTIFICATION INVITING TENDERS DATED 20.12.2016 AT ANNEX-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:39466 WP No. 18445 of 2017
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
Therefore, the petition is disposed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
KG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4
SRI. N SUBRAMANYAM
B K NANDA GOPAL
THE GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM BSNL
BHARATH BROADBAND NIGAM LIMITED
DY. GENERAL MANAGER OFFICE OF GMTD BSNL
ASST. GENERAL MANGER OFFICE OF GMTD BSNL
M.NAGAPRASANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
