The High Court at Bengaluru directed respondents 1 and 2 to reconsider representations made by the petitioner regarding his appointment, ordering a decision within eight weeks from the date of the order.
Direction to respondents 1 and 2 to reconsider representations made by the petitioner and reach a decision within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP NO.1840 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1840 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
CHANDRANAIK G. S/O GOVINDA NAIK AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O BEERANAHALLI, MATTIGHATTA POST, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMANGALUR DISTRICT – 577 548.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANKALKOTE RAJENDRA SHANTAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
WP NO.1840 OF 2023
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.S. NAGARAJA, AGA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 TO RECONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 23RD AUGUST, 2021, 18TH FEBRUARY, 2022, 17TH MAY, 2022, 04TH JUNE, 2022 AND 08TH JUNE, 2022 TO THE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 VIDE ANNEXURES- ‘R’, ‘S’, ‘U’, ‘V’, ‘W’ AND ‘X’ BY GIVING APPOINTMENT TO THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Sri. M.S. Nagaraja, learned Additional Government
Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2.
counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. M.S. Nagaraja,
WP NO.1840 OF 2023
learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed.
SD/JUDGE
ARK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's representations regarding appointment.
Whether the respondents are required to reach a decision within a specific timeframe.
Chandranaik G.
The State of Karnataka Rep. by Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department
Karnataka Examination Authority Rep. by its Executive Director
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
