Sri.Roopla Naika v. the Under Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court permitted the petitioner to file a representation for enhanced compensation under Section 29 of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966, conditional upon KIADB having granted similar benefits in general award cases. The petition was disposed of, keeping contentions open.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was permitted to file a representation for enhanced benefit under Section 29(2) of the 1966 Act, provided KIADB has accorded similar benefits in general award cases; KIADB to consider w
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.17891 OF 2021 (LA - KIADB)
BETWEEN:
SRI.ROOPLA NAIKA, S/O RAMANA NAIKA, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, R/AT EMMERAHALLI THANDA, KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 560 058.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- THE UNDER SECRETARY, STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, whose land falls in the General Award category, is entitled to enhancement under Section 29 of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966.
Whether the petitioner can file a representation for enhanced benefit with a commitment from KIADB to consider it within three months.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri. Roopla Naika
- respondent
The Under Secretary, State of Karnataka
- respondent
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/17891/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court