Dismissed

Varalakshmi v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Mar 2023WP/1726/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking directions to respondents regarding certain representations. On preliminary hearing, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge a specific order before the appropriate authority.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge M.R.No.1/1989-90 before the appropriate authority.

Varalakshmi Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 1726 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.1726 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

VARALAKSHMI

¶9

W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED 60 YEARS

¶10

SHILPA D/O LATE VENKATESH AGED 35 YEARS

¶11

MANJUNATH V S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED 31 YEARS

¶12

MADHU

¶13

S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED 29 YEARS

¶14

Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.87/2, JANATHA COLONY GIDHADA KONENA HALLI YASHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU - 560 091.

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY SRI. KARUMBAIAH T.A, ADVOCATE)

¶18

AND:

¶19

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING

¶20

¶21

WP No. 1726 of 2023

¶22

DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. BY ITS SECRETARY

¶23

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶24

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION 2^ND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. V.SESHU, HCGP R1-R3)

¶27

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 2^ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER ANNEXURE-G, THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.10.2022 GIVEN BY THE 2^ND PETITIONER AND TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD; b) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 3^RD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER ANNEXURE-H, THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.10.2022 GIVEN BY THE 2^ND PETITIONER AND TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD; c) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶29

¶30

WP No. 1726 of 2023

¶31

ORDER

¶32

Sri.Karumbaiah, learned counsel for petitioner after

¶33

arguing the matter for some time seek leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to challenge M.R.No.1/1989-90 before appropriate Authority.

¶34

The submission of the learned counsel for the

¶35

petitioner is placed on record.

¶36

Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as sought for.

¶37

Sd/JUDGE

¶38

¶39

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Varalakshmi v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Varalakshmi v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri K N Nanjunda Shastry Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Gangaraju v B Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri Ramesh G Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri K J Lokesh Vs State of Karnataka

Chandramma Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Santhosh Thazhathu Vs State of Karnataka