Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of an impugned order. The petition was dismissed as not pressed based on a compromise petition filed by the parties who were not present in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.1636 OF 2020 (LR)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SUCHITRA M J Location: High Court of Karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VYASA RAO K. S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
WP No. 1636 of 2020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 & R3, SRI. S. K. ACHARYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-A DATED 6.8.1980 PASSED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS GRANT OF OCCUPANCY RIGHTS IN RESPECT OF 3 CENTS OF LAND IN S.NO.88/33 OF NO.76, BADAGUBETTU VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A compromise petition dated 8/15.02.2023 under
Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC is filed by petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 as well as respondent No.2.
WP No. 1636 of 2020
petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
SSD
Prabananda Nicholas Mathias and another
The Land Tribunal Udupi
Austin Richmond Premananth Clare
State of Karnataka
S.G. Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
