The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of a DT order due to non-compliance of office objections and failure of the petitioner to appear before the court.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 15747 OF 2020 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. GURU PRASAD A., ADVOCATE(NO REPRESENTATION))
AND:
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CORPORATION BANK, ZONAL OFFICE, P.B. NO. 64, CORPORATION BANK ROAD, UDUPI - 576 101.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. V.B. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/RESPONDENT)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF DISMISSAL DATED 26.11.2019 PASSED
NC: 2023:KHC:46933 WP No. 15747 of 2020
BY THE HONBLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II, BENGALURU IN S A NO.348/2019 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Sri. Guru Prasad. A., learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. V. B. Ravishankar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
petition is dismissal for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
PHM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
Mr. C.M. Mupasila @ Saddam and Mrs. Seema Banu
The Authorized Officer Corporation Bank
M.G.S. Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
