Disposed

Shiddappa v. the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Karnataka HC16 Jan 2023WP/139939/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka, via a writ petition, directed the 2nd respondent, the Executive Engineer, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.10.2018 concerning land acquisition compensation interest and pass an appropriate order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No. 2 directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.10.2018 and pass an appropriate order within three months.

Shiddappa Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

WP No. 139939 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 139939 OF 2020 (LA-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SHIDDAPPA S/O. NAGAPPA MALI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KASABHAJAMBAGI, TQ: MUDHOL-587313, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. K ANANDKUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER M. P. PROJECT (III), BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101.

¶13

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Ka.Nee.Ni.Ni., MBC DIVISION NO.1, GADDANAKERI CAMP, BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101.

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

(BY SRI. PRASHANT V.MOGALI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SHIVARAJ S.BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT-AUTHORITIES NO.2 TO PAY THE DAMAGE FROM 15-02-2005 TO 01-10-2015 IN THE INTEREST IN THE AMOUNT ENTITLED UNDER THE LAW BY CONSIDERING HIS APPLICATION/REPRESENTATION DATED 04.10.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-C.

¶17

¶18

WP No. 139939 of 2020

¶19

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B- GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

ORDER

¶21

In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:

¶22

“Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondentauthorities no.2 to pay the damage from 15-02-2005 to 01-10-2015 in the interest in the amount entitled under the law by considering his application/representation dated 04.10.2018 vide Annexure-C.

¶23

Any other and further relief as this Honorable Court deems fit and just in the ends of justice”

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and learned counsel for respondent No.2. Perused the material on record.

¶25

It is the grievance of the petitioner that his representation dated 04.10.2018 at Annexure-C submitted to the 2^nd respondent has not been considered so far by them nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the

¶26

¶27

WP No. 139939 of 2020

¶28

petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition.

¶29

Per contra , learned counsel for the 2^nd

¶30

respondent submits that if reasonable time is given, they would consider and pass necessary order on the said representations.

¶31

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, respondent No.2 is hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioner and consider his representation dated 04.10.2018 at Annexure-C and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶32

With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed off.

¶33

SD/JUDGE

¶34

CLK

Shiddappa v. the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiddappa v. the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Mohan S/O Annappa Shanalli Vs the Executive Engineer (Elec)

Smt. Premavva W/O Devappa Uppar Vs Dyamappa S/O Kariyappa Bhavi @ Kinnal

Ravindra S/O Dundappa Kittur Vs the Government of Karnataka

Basanagouda S/O. Shankargouda Patil Vs the Project Director

Smt. Lila Aliyas Lilavathi W/O Ashok Bevinmar Vs Smt. Yellakka Alias Yallakka W/O Yellappa Kalal

Kishor Kumar Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited