The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The dismissal was ordered for non-prosecution due to the non-compliance of office objections despite a prior order dated 22.09.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION No. 13503 OF 2021 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GEETHANJALI W/O YOGANANDA A.S AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ARALAGUPPE POST KIBBANAHALLI HOBLI TIPTUR TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 572 212.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI SRIKANTH M P, ADVOCATE – ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:46235 WP No. 13503 of 2021
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD K.R. CIRCLE BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 18.04.2017 PASSED BY RESPONDENT No. 1 VIDE ANNEXURE-T IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. Despite the order dated 22.09.2023, the office
objections are not complied.
NC: 2023:KHC:46235 WP No. 13503 of 2021
for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding quashing of order should be disposed of due to non-compliance of office objections.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. GEETHANJALI W/O YOGANANDA A.S
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS SECONDARY EDUCATION
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS TUMKUR SOUTH
THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER TIPTUR
N S SANJAY GOWDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
