The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition praying for quashing of criminal proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court allowed the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the petition and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel seeking leave to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO.11759 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C. NO.3258/2015 ON THE FILE OF VIII ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MYSORE AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 138 AND 142 OF N.I.ACT, 1881 VIDE ANNEXURE-F.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
petition.
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
hkh.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking quashing of proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is maintainable.
Whether leave should be granted to withdraw the petition.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sri Ravindranath B.L.
Sri H.R. Puttaboyi
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
