Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt. Suma Vs Sri. Javeed Khan — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2023)

Home
Karnataka HC
2023
Smt. Suma Vs Sri. Javeed KhanSmt. Suma v. Sri. Javeed Khan

Dismissed

Smt. Suma v. Sri. Javeed Khan

Karnataka HC13 Oct 2023WP/1165/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew the writ petition under Article 226, rendering it infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition accordingly.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

NC: 2023:KHC:37561 WP No.1165 of 2019

1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.1165 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SMT. SUMA D/O THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O. PAREKOPPALE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571 107.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. ROHITH GOWDA, ADV.,)

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

AND:

SRI. JAVEED KHAN S/O SERVER KHAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O. BEHIND POLICE QUARTERS PERIYAPATNA TOWN MYSURU DISTRICT-571 107.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
SUMA D/O THAMMAIAH
respondent
JAVEED KHAN S/O SERVER KHAN
respondent
GIRISH S/O LAKKEGOWDA
respondent
K. ABDUL BASHEER S/O K. ABDUL SATTAR
respondent
T.K. RAJEGOWDA S/O LATE THAMMEGOWDA
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 13 Oct 2023 · October
Registered: 8 Jan 2019
Case no.: WP/1165/2019

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Vijaykumar A. Patil

Shekhara Vs G S Somashekara
9 Oct 2023
Mr. M. H. Sanaulla Vs Mr. Eliyas M. U.
9 Oct 2023
Smt Radha Vs Smt Venkatamma
9 Oct 2023
Sri B v Kumar Vs Sri Muniyappa
13 Oct 2023
B. Lakshmidevamma Vs S. v. Nagendra

Cite this judgement

Smt. Suma v. Sri. Javeed Khan, WP/1165/2019 (KA), decided on 13 October 2023.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as having become infructuous following the withdrawal of the petition by the petitioner's counsel.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

SRI. GIRISH S/O LAKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/O. NO.1650, AKASH NILAYA NEAR POLICE STATION PERIYAPATNA TOWN MYSURU DISTRICT-571 107.

SRI. K. ABDUL BASHEER S/O K. ABDUL SATTAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O. BEHIND POLICE QUARTERS GANDHINAGAR, PERIYAPATNA TOWN MYSURU DISTRICT-571 107.

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:37561 WP No.1165 of 2019

SRI. T.K. RAJEGOWDA S/O LATE THAMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

YASHASWINI D/O T. K. RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS.

DILEEP NILAVAGILU KAVAL S/O T.K. RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS.

SRI. T.K. CHIKKEGOWDA S/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS.

SRI. RAVI S/O T.K. KRISHNEGOWDA AGED MAJOR.

RESPONDENTS NOS.4 TO 8 ARE R/AT TELAGINAKUPPE VILLAGE RAVANDURU HOBLI PERIYAPATNA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571108.

…RESPONDENTS

(R1 SERVED)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS. QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, HUNSUR, MYSURU DISTRICT IN RA NO.469/2018 DT:16.11.2018 PASSED IN IA NO.1/2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-M. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-M PASSED BY THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, HUNSUR, MYSURU DISTRICT IN R.A.NO.469/2018 DT:16.11.2018 PASSED IN I.A.NO.1/18 PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE W.P.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:37561 WP No.1165 of 2019

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. The memo reads as under:

"The above named petitioner submits that the above petition becomes infructuous hence they prayed this Hon'ble court may be pleased to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn. Hence, this memo kindly accepts the same to meet the ends of justice and equity."

The said memo is placed on record.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having

become infructuous.

Sd/JUDGE

RV

YASHASWINI D/O T. K. RAJEGOWDA

Coram

AI extract

VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

CNR

KAHC010011222019

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Vijaykumar A. Patil

Disposal

DISMISSED

13 Oct 2023

M/S Shree Yesholaxmi Constructions Ltd. Vs Sri v Ramaiah

13 Oct 2023