Petitioners sought withdrawal of writ petition filed under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC. The court considered the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without substantive reasoning.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 11360 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.94D MITTAL NIWAS, 9TH CROSS ROAD, RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 080.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. MOHIMA S, ADVOCATE FOR M/S. DHANANJAY JOSHI ASSOCIATES FOR VARSHA R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S MAC CHARLES (INDIA) LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
P.B.NO.174, NO.28, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 052.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SANJAY NAIR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.03.2020 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE MAGISTRATE IN C.C.NO.3095 OF 2019, DATED 16.03.2020, VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners have filed a memo
dated 25.10.2023, seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59 CT: BHK
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Trishul Developers
Mr. Niraj Mittal
Mr. O.P. Mittal
Mrs. Uma Mittal
Mrs. Jyothi Mittal
M/s Mac Charles (India) Limited
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
