Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution praying to quash respondent orders. Petitioner filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition citing a compromise settlement in a civil suit. Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:8100 WP No. 112695 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 112695 OF 2019 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. POPAT VITHOBA MANE, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: AJUR, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591212. (BY SRI. SANGRAM S KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
… PETITIONER
AND:
VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Date: 2023.08.04 10:54:37 +0530
DIST: BELAGAVI-591212.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V S KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R1-R2; SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADV. FOR R4; R3 DECEASED; R5, R6, R9, R10 ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICELS 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT CERTIORARI AND QUASHED THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BEARING NO. RTS:AP-12:93-94 DATED 28.08.1993 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 BEARING NO. RB/RTA/129/13-14 DATED 22.04.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC-D:8100 WP No. 112695 of 2019
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as follows:
“ Herein the memo on behalf of the petitioner is as under:
The petitioner and respondents have settled their dispute amiably in O.S. No.50/2012 by filing compromise petition before the trial Court(Lok Adalat) and the same is accepted; hence, the above writ petition may kindly be disposed of as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity. Hence, the memo.”
3. In terms of the memo, the petition is disposed of as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
kmv Ct:Bck
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri. Popat Vithoba Mane
The Dy. Commissioner
Shri. Chandrakanat Shivagouda Patil
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
