Petitioners sought to quash an order under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. On hearing, the petitioners filed a memo withdrawing the petition. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 11109 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.24, 23RD MAIN, JP NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU – 560 078, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. BHARATH KUMAR.
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
TATA SILK FARM, BASAVANAGUDI,
BENGALURU – 560 004.
KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 078.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ANAND MUTTALLI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.CHINTAN CHINNAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 5.8.2020 PASSED IN C.P.NO.91/BB/2020 ANNEXURE-A AS HAVING BEEN PASSED WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:46059 WP No. 11109 of 2020
ORDER
memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
bnv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Enterprise Software Solutions Lab P Ltd.
Mr. Anand Kumar Jain
Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Kothari
Mr. Bharath Kumar
Ms. Anju Jain
Ms. Bhavna Kothari
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
