Petitioner sought quashing of an order as infructuous after the underlying criminal case was disposed of. The court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:14747 WP No. 110923 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 110923 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.GEETA W/O SIDDAPPA JANNAR AGE:47 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE/HOUSE HOLD WORK R/O NAVALGUND, DIST:DHARWAD
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M C HUKKERI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHIVAKUMAR HIREMATH
Digitally signed by SHIVAKUMAR HIREMATH Date: 2023.12.21 14:28:21 +0530
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. J.S.SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO:-QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON I.A.NO.7 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND SPL.JUDGE DHARWAD AT:DHARWAD, IN R.A.NO.06/2015 ON 16.04.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-H. AND ALLOW THE APPLICATIONS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC-D:14747 WP No. 110923 of 2019
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo
seeking disposal of the writ petition as infructuous.
Memo reads as under:
“The petitioner submits as under:
That, the R.A.No.4/2015 case is finally disposed off before the lower appellate Court on 27.11.2021, In view of the same the present writ petition is become infructuous, therefore, this Hon’ble Court may dismissed the case as infructuous, in the interest of justice.”
Memo is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed
as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31
NAA
GEETA W/O SIDDAPPA JANNAR
KALLAVVA W/O CHANNAPPA MANNUR
BASAVVA W/O SIDDAPPA NARTI
SHIVAKUMAR HIREMATH
VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
