Nagarathnamma v. Rajammanni
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear for the hearing of the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court dismissed the petition for default.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:39738 WP No. 10838 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10838 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
NAGARATHNAMMA W/O NARARAJASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT SY.NO.603/3, UDIGALA VILLAGE, HARAVE HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT-571303.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANATH KUMARA K M.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAJAMMANNI W/O MAHADEVASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT MADAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT-571303.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.MAHESHA., ADVOCATE)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nagarathnamma W/o Nararajashetty
- respondent
Rajammanni W/o Mahadevashetty
Coram
B M Shyam Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/10838/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court