The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench dismissed the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as it was withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:12131 WP No. 107199 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.107199 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
VISHWARADHYA S/O. CHANNABASAYYASWAMY GURUSTHALMATH, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: VIRAKTAMATH ONI, DHARWAD-580001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI NARAYAN V. YAJI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MALLIKARJUN @ SHANKRAYYA S/O CHANNABASAYYA GURUSTHALMATH, BY HIS LRS
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR
Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Date: 2023.10.13 11:46:31 +0530
NC: 2023:KHC-D:12131 WP No. 107199 of 2019
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI DINESH M. KULKARNI, ADV, FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE QUASH THE ORDER DATED 08.02.2019 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DHARWAD ON IA NO.II IN FDP NO.35/2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AS NULL AND VOID, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
interlocutory applications, if any, does not survive for
consideration and are disposed of accordingly.
AM/-. List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VISHWARADHYA S/O. CHANNABASAYYASWAMY
MALLIKARJUN @ SHANKRAYYA S/O CHANNABASAYYA
SHIVAKUMAR S/O. MALLIKARJUN
SMT. UMA W/O. VERESHA
MAHESSH S/O. MALLIKARJUN
CHANDRAKANT S/O. MALLIKARJUN
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
